Opinion
Nos. 20130212 20130213 20130218.
2013-08-29
In the Interest of N.R., a Child Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. S.R., Mother and N.R., Father, Respondents and Appellants. In the Interest of D.R., a Child Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. S.R., Mother and N.R., Father, Respondents and Appellants. In the Interest of S.C., a Child Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. S.R., Mother and C.C., Father, Respondents S.R., Mother, Appellant.
Appeals from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge. Pam H. Ormand, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee. Daniel A. Gulya (argued) and Gene W. Doeling Jr. (on brief), Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant N.R.
Appeals from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
Pam H. Ormand, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee. Daniel A. Gulya (argued) and Gene W. Doeling Jr. (on brief), Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant N.R.
Douglas W. Nesheim, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant S.R.
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] S.R., the mother of S.C., N.R., and D.R., and N.R., the father of N.R. and D.R., appealed from a juvenile court order finding the children are deprived and terminating S.R. and N.R.'s parental rights. N.R. argued the court erred in finding that N.R. and D.R. were deprived and that the deprivation was likely to continue. S.R. argued the district court erred in finding the deprivation of the children was likely to continue and the children would likely suffer harm absent termination of parental rights. We conclude the court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).