Opinion
No. 1283 Index No. 654665/21 Case No. 2022-05385
12-21-2023
Cuddy & Feder LLP, White Plains (Brendan Goodhouse of counsel), for appellant. Borg & Bryks LLP, New York (M. Alexander Bowie, II of counsel), for Osk IX, LLC, respondent.
Cuddy & Feder LLP, White Plains (Brendan Goodhouse of counsel), for appellant.
Borg & Bryks LLP, New York (M. Alexander Bowie, II of counsel), for Osk IX, LLC, respondent.
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., González, Scarpulla, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer Schecter, J.), entered November 28, 2022, which denied plaintiff's motion to reargue its motion to release or modify its undertaking, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.
No appeal lies from the denial of the motion to reargue (see Phillips v Murtha, 215 A.D.3d 408, 408 [1st Dept 2023]). The order on appeal denied plaintiff's motion to reargue its prior motion to release or modify its undertaking. To the extent plaintiff argues it is appealing from the grant of defendant's motion to award attorneys' fees, the order appealed from, as it relates to defendant's motion, only augmented relief previously granted to the extent of calculating reasonable fees. Plaintiff's arguments were considered and rejected in the prior unappealed order deciding the motion to release or modify the undertaking.