From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nowlin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 11, 1972
484 S.W.2d 339 (Ark. 1972)

Opinion

No. 5747.

Opinion delivered September 11, 1972

RAPE — EVIDENCE — CORROBORATION OF FEMALE, NECESSITY OF. — Uncorroborated testimony of prosecutrix under age 16 held sufficient to sustain a conviction of third degree rape.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, First Division, William J. Kirby, Judge; affirmed.

Harold L. Hall, for appellants.

Ray Thornton, Atty. Gen., by: James A. Neal, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellants James Nowlin, Bruce Nowlin and Gary Nowlin were convicted of third degree rape for having sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 years of age upon the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecuting witness. They contend that such uncorroborated testimony is insufficient to sustain a conviction. We have held to the contrary in numerous cases. See Ragsdale v. State, 132 Ark. 210, 200 S.W. 802 (1918); Rogers v. State, 237 Ark. 437, 373 S.W.2d 705 (1963); Skaggs v. State, 234 Ark. 510, 353 S.W.2d 3 (1961); and Powell v. State, 231 Ark. 737, 332 S.W.2d 483 (1960).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nowlin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 11, 1972
484 S.W.2d 339 (Ark. 1972)
Case details for

Nowlin v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES NOWLIN ET AL v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 11, 1972

Citations

484 S.W.2d 339 (Ark. 1972)
484 S.W.2d 339

Citing Cases

Pickens v. State

[4] The victim testified Pickens had sexual intercourse with her. There is no question that in the…

Kitchen v. State

No corroboration of the testimony of the victims was required. Nowlin v. State, 252 Ark. 870, 481 S.W.2d 320;…