From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nowak v. Pillich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants Robert B. Cameron and Donn Feldman Corp., former clients of the law firm of Albrecht, Maguire, Heffern Gregg (Albrecht, Maguire), seek to disqualify the firm from representing plaintiffs in this action. In denying defendants' disqualification motion, the IAS Court properly determined that defendants failed to meet their burden of establishing either a substantial relationship between the subject matter of the prior representation and the present litigation or any specific, relevant, confidential information imparted to Albrecht, Maguire (see, Aerojet Props. v State of New York, 138 A.D.2d 39, 40; Hunkins v Lake Placid Vacation Corp., 120 A.D.2d 199, 201; Saftler v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 95 A.D.2d 54, 57). The record establishes only that a former Albrecht, Maguire associate assisted defendants in a 1985 real estate purchase and that one of the defendants unsuccessfully attempted to retain Albrecht, Maguire to represent him in a pending Federal action. Defendants' conclusory assertions that Albrecht, Maguire's representation of plaintiffs will prejudice their defense and that "sensitive and confidential information was transmitted" to the firm are insufficient to deprive plaintiffs of their choice of counsel (see, Hunkins v Lake Placid Vacation Corp., supra, at 202; see also, S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S.H. Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 437).


Summaries of

Nowak v. Pillich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Nowak v. Pillich

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY F. NOWAK et al., Respondents, v. KEITH W. PILLICH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 443

Citing Cases

Smothers v. County of Erie

We conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion ( see, Olmoz v.…

Hemmings v. Ivy League Apt Corp.

In this case, plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that, if Chehebar is called as a witness, he will provide…