From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nowak v. Oklahoma League for the Blind

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1584) CA 01-01308

December 21, 2001.

(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Vacate Order and Judgment.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HAYES, WISNER, SCUDDER AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and default order and judgment vacated.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant seeking to vacate a prior order on liability entered upon its default and a money judgment entered upon its default. With the exception of circumstances not present here, where a plaintiff seeks to obtain a default judgment, "any defendant who has appeared is entitled to at least five days' notice of the time and place of the application" (CPLR 3215 [g] [1]). It is undisputed that plaintiff failed to provide defendant with such notice. That failure deprived the court of jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's application, and thus the order on liability and the money judgment are null ( see, Adames v. New York City Tr. Auth., 126 A.D.2d 462; Tomczak v. Szczur, 56 A.D.2d 737; see also, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 128 A.D.2d 518, 519).


Summaries of

Nowak v. Oklahoma League for the Blind

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Nowak v. Oklahoma League for the Blind

Case Details

Full title:TODD NOWAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. OKLAHOMA LEAGUE FOR THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 313

Citing Cases

State Bank v. Kaanam, LLC

We conclude that defendants established in support of the motion to vacate that there is an issue of fact…

Paulus v. Christopher Vacirca, Inc.

In that case, the Fourth Department concluded that the defendant's pro se letter to the plaintiff's attorney…