Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Oksendahl

1 Citing case

  1. Pinnacle Enter. v. L. Cl. for Redevelopment Auth

    Case No. 4:10CV00943 AGF (E.D. Mo. Oct. 22, 2010)

    If Defendants ultimately prevail on the merits of Pinnacle's claims against them, they may be entitled to receive the fees they now request at that time. Defendants' reliance on Novus Franchising, Inc., v. Oksendahl, No. 07-1964 (JRT/FLN), 2008 WL 835681 (D. Minn. Mar. 27, 2008), is misplaced. In Novus, the plaintiff filed motions for preliminary injunction, alleging that defendants were continuing to provide certain services in violation of a two-year non-compete provision in the parties' franchise agreement.