From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novitskiy v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01437-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01437-PAB-MEH

04-11-2016

SERGEY NOVITSKIY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55 [Docket No. 32] and Motion for Default Judgment with a Sworn Affidavit Attached, Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55 [Docket No. 39]. In light of plaintiff's pro se status, the Court construes his filings liberally. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 & n.3 (10th Cir. 1991).

On February 19, 2016, plaintiff filed his first motion for default judgment. Docket No. 32. On March 2, 2016, plaintiff filed his second motion for default judgment. Docket No. 39.

In order to obtain a judgment by default, a party must follow the two-step process described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. First, he must seek an entry of default from the Clerk of the Court under Rule 55(a). Rule 55(a) provides that, "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Second, after default has been entered by the Clerk, the party must seek default judgment according to the strictures of Rule 55(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b); Williams v. Smithson, 1995 WL 365988, at *1 (10th Cir. June 20, 1995) (unpublished) (citing Meehan v. Snow, 652 F.2d 274, 276 (2d Cir. 1981)); State Resources Corp., v. Nature's Way Dairy LLC, No. 10-cv-00576-PAB-KMT, 2010 WL 4510902, at *1 (D. Colo. Nov. 2, 2010) (citation omitted). Failure to successfully complete the first step of obtaining an entry of default necessarily precludes the granting of default judgment in step two. See Williams, 1995 WL 365988, at *1; State Resources Corp., 2010 WL 4510902, at *1.

In the present case, plaintiff requests judgment by default, but has not obtained an entry of default from the Clerk of Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Construing plaintiff's motions liberally, the Court will interpret them as requests for entry of default. Thus, the Court will refer plaintiff's motions to the Clerk of Court.

For the foregoing reasons, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 55 [Docket No. 32] and Motion for Default Judgment with a Sworn Affidavit Attached, Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55 [Docket No. 39], construed as motions for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), are referred to the Clerk of Court.

DATED April 11, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Novitskiy v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01437-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Novitskiy v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SERGEY NOVITSKIY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01437-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2016)