From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novick v. Martinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 1947
271 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

January 20, 1947.


In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, or for damages in lieu thereof, defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. There are questions of fact in the case, the determination of which should await a trial. The decision of those questions may be affected by the disputed claims of the parties in respect of whether or not the relationship of attorney and client existed between defendants and plaintiff's husband. ( Frost v. Bachman, 259 App. Div. 745, affd. 283 N.Y. 744, motion for reargument denied 284 N.Y. 580. ) Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Novick v. Martinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 1947
271 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Novick v. Martinelli

Case Details

Full title:BELLE NOVICK, Respondent, v. JOHN MARTINELLI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)