From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novick v. Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the defendant Kurtz to file a late answer. The delay on the part of the defendant was brief and the excuse for the delay was reasonable (see, CPLR 3012 [d]). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Novick v. Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Novick v. Kurtz

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. NOVICK, Appellant, v. THEODORE KURTZ, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 977