From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. State Board of Equalization Assessment

Supreme Court of Nebraska
May 19, 1967
150 N.W.2d 898 (Neb. 1967)

Opinion

No. 36448.

Filed May 19, 1967.

Taxation. The decision of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment ordering Douglas County to increase its assessed valuation of urban and suburban property 24 percent was arbitrary and unreasonable.

Appeal from the state Board of Equalization and Assessment. Reversed.

Beber, Richards Polack, Steven J. Riekes, and Michael G. Brady, for appellants.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Homer G. Hamilton, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C.J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, and NEWTON, JJ., and WHITE, District Judge.


This is an appeal by Julius Novak, a resident and taxpayer of Douglas County, and Ben Realty Company, from an order of the state Board of Equalization and Assessment increasing the valuation of industrial and commercial property within incorporated municipalities in Douglas County 24 percent.

This; appeal involves the same issue decided today in Brandeis Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization Assessment, post p. 750, 150 N.W.2d 893, and is controlled by that opinion. For the reasons enunciated therein, the order of the state Board of Equalization and Assessment is reversed as to these appellants.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Novak v. State Board of Equalization Assessment

Supreme Court of Nebraska
May 19, 1967
150 N.W.2d 898 (Neb. 1967)
Case details for

Novak v. State Board of Equalization Assessment

Case Details

Full title:IN RE VALUATION AND EQUALIZATION OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: May 19, 1967

Citations

150 N.W.2d 898 (Neb. 1967)
150 N.W.2d 898

Citing Cases

LeDioyt v. County of Keith

" See, also, Ewert Implement Co. v. Board of Equalization, 160 Neb. 445, 70 N.W.2d 397. In Novak v. Board of…

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Board of Equalization

This action was before us and decision rendered in 153 Neb. 776, 46 N.W.2d 171. Motion for rehearing was…