From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-0632 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-0632.

June 8, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The defense has filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence regarding the defendants' violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA) and the Pennsylvania Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations (UCSPR). The motion has been briefed.

Without minimizing the effort of both counsel, we wish to note that in our Memorandum and Order of April 5, 2005 denying the cross-motions for summary judgment, we have already held that conduct consisting of violations of unfair insurance practices, although not per se evidence of bad faith, may be admissible in a bad faith claim, especially if coupled with repeated conduct. We cited authority for such a conclusion.

Accordingly, the defense motion is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Novak v. Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-0632 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2005)
Case details for

Novak v. Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:KIM L. NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE HALCYON INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 8, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-0632 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2005)