From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Novak

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 30, 2013
110 A.D.3d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-30

In the Matter of John NOVAK, respondent, v. Betsy NOVAK, appellant.

Betsy Novak, Rye Brook, N.Y., appellant pro se. Stanley Messinger, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.


Betsy Novak, Rye Brook, N.Y., appellant pro se. Stanley Messinger, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Schauer, J.), entered November 28, 2012, which vacated a temporary order of support entered October 18, 2012, directing the father to pay child support in the sum of $183 per week.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The order appealed from vacated a temporary order of support entered October 18, 2012, directing the father to pay child support in the sum of $183 per week. Since the order appealed from is not an order of disposition, it is not appealable as of right ( see Family Ct. Act § 1112[a]; Matter of Gertzulin v. Gertzulin, 27 A.D.3d 562, 562, 810 N.Y.S.2d 355; Matter of Ciotti v. Butera, 24 A.D.2d 983, 265 N.Y.S.2d 127), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Novak v. Novak

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 30, 2013
110 A.D.3d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Novak v. Novak

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John NOVAK, respondent, v. Betsy NOVAK, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 30, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7045
975 N.Y.S.2d 885

Citing Cases

Tedeschi v. Tedeschi

In the order appealed from, the Family Court directed the mother to seek permission of the court before…