From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Mich. Dep't O Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
Civil Case No. 11-14550 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 11-14550

12-27-2012

THEODORE NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT O CORRECTIONS, ET AL. Defendants.


Honorable Patrick J. Duggan


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS TO AMEND COMPLAINT

On October 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 28, 2011, this Court summarily dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 and 1915A and entered a judgment. Plaintiff thereafter filed an appeal with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals which was dismissed for want of prosecution on June 18, 2002. On September 21 and November 30, 2012, this Court received letters from Plaintiff in which he states an interest in amending his complaint. The Court construes Plaintiff's letters as motions to file an amended complaint. However, because Plaintiff's initial complaint was dismissed and judgment was entered in November 2011, his case has been long closed. In short, there is no pending complaint to amend.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's request to amend his complaint is DENIED.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
Theodore Novak, #251175
G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility
3500 N. Elm Road
Jackson, MI 49201


Summaries of

Novak v. Mich. Dep't O Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
Civil Case No. 11-14550 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Novak v. Mich. Dep't O Corr.

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT O CORRECTIONS, ET AL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No. 11-14550 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 27, 2012)