From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Mendez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-01721 JAM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01721 JAM AC PS

06-28-2021

JOSEPH WILLIAM NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. TINA MENDEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On May 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 28. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED and this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. All outstanding motions (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as MOOT.


Summaries of

Novak v. Mendez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-01721 JAM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Novak v. Mendez

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WILLIAM NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. TINA MENDEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01721 JAM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)