From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Equitable Casualty and Surety Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.


Order of Appellate Term and order and judgment of the Municipal Court reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion for summary judgment denied. This is an action upon an undertaking given upon an appeal. It is provided by section 161 of the Civil Practice Act that no action may be maintained upon such an undertaking "until ten days have expired, since the service upon the attorney for the appellant and upon the sureties on such undertaking, of a written notice of the entry of a judgment or order affirming the judgment or order appealed from or dismissing the appeal." Compliance with this section is a condition precedent, and in the absence of these allegations the complaint does not state a cause of action. ( Porter v. Kingsbury, 71 N.Y. 588; First Bank of Notasulga v. Casualty Co., 176 App. Div. 109.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Novak v. Equitable Casualty and Surety Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Novak v. Equitable Casualty and Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:RUTH NOVAK, an Infant over the Age of Fourteen Years, by ABRAHAM NOVAK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)