From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nouri v. Reich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.).


The jury's verdict was clearly based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and should thus not be set aside. (Delgado v Board of Educ., 65 A.D.2d 547, affd 48 N.Y.2d 643.) Indeed, there was conflicting evidence regarding whether Dr. Reich prescribed medication for plaintiff on August 4, 1987 and the jury was free to believe defendant's testimony and discredit the other witnesses' testimony and the questionable physical evidence (see, e.g., Sheps v Hall Co., 112 A.D.2d 281, 283).

We also note that plaintiff is barred from raising the issue of whether the medical malpractice statute of limitations was tolled in this case based upon an alleged June 1987 medical treatment by defendant doctor, since plaintiff stipulated at trial to limit the issue to whether defendant prescribed medication for plaintiff on August 4, 1987 (see, Deitsch Textiles v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 62 N.Y.2d 999, 1002).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Nouri v. Reich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Nouri v. Reich

Case Details

Full title:NAMIR NOURI, Appellant, v. LILLIAN M. REICH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

Buttles v. Natale

As such, there is no present challenge to the jury's verdict valuing the corporation at $324,000 or Supreme…