From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nottingham v. Lycoming Cnty. Pub. Defenders

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 8, 2023
4:22-CV-330 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-CV-330

02-08-2023

JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. LYCOMING COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS, etal., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge William Arbuckle's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 26), Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Docs. 27,28), and all other documents of record, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 26) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein.
2. Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. 27, 28) are OVERRULED.
3. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 15) is DISMISSED without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

Nottingham v. Lycoming Cnty. Pub. Defenders

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 8, 2023
4:22-CV-330 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Nottingham v. Lycoming Cnty. Pub. Defenders

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. LYCOMING COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

4:22-CV-330 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 8, 2023)