From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nosraty v. Oudkirk

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:23-cv-04632-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-04632-MCS-PD

01-02-2024

KEN BAHOJB NOSRATY, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT M. OUDKIRK, Deputy Chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy in Turkey; ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

MARK C. SCARSI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the Court's Order granting Defendants Scott M. Oudkirk and Antony Blinken's motion to dismiss without leave to amend, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that judgment is entered on all claims in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff Ken Bahojb Nosraty's claims alleging a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and the right of due process under the Fifth Amendment and petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice.

Plaintiff shall take nothing from his action against Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nosraty v. Oudkirk

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:23-cv-04632-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Nosraty v. Oudkirk

Case Details

Full title:KEN BAHOJB NOSRATY, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT M. OUDKIRK, Deputy Chief of…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-04632-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)