Opinion
2:23-cv-1218-JES-KCD
05-24-2024
DANESH NOSHIRVAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER COUTURE, RALPH GARRAMONE M.D., RALPH GARRAMONE M.D. P.A., CENTRAL PARK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, WRAITH, LLC, SULLIVAN STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC, HAIRPIN TURN, LLC, OMG REALTY, LLC, R G WEIGHT MANAGEMENT, LLC, CENTRAL PARK SOUTH, LLC, BRANTLEE, LLC, LEGACY OF MARIE GARRAMONE, LLC, GARRAMONE MARKETING, INC., 5681 DIVISION LLC, THE LAW OFFICE OF PATRICK TRAINOR ESQ. LLC, PATRICK TRAINOR and ANTI-DOXING LEAGUE INC., Defendants.
ORDER
KYLE C. DUDEK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff moves for the entry of a clerk's default against Defendant Central Park South, LLC. (Doc. 73.) Central Park South responded in opposition. (Doc. 85.) Central Park South explains that it did not respond to the amended complaint because it is a “name only” company with no assets, and Defendant Central Park of Southwest Florida (“SW”) was formed in its place. Central Park South asserts that its failure to answer was not willful or the product of bad faith, as it believed SW's replacement would obviate the need to respond. (Doc. 85 at 5.)
A clerk's default is not proper on such facts. See, e.g., Montecalvo v. Brandon Auto Clinic, Inc., No. 8:07-CV-851-T-30MSS, 2007 WL 2155581, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 26, 2007) (“The Rule does not contemplate the entry of default only upon a defendant's failure to answer, but rather upon a defendant's failure to respond or defend against the allegations in a complaint.”). Central Park South has appeared through counsel and conferred with Plaintiff concerning its answer. And Central Park South asserts that it has meritorious defenses that weigh against entering a clerk's default. Because “defaults are seen with disfavor [given] the strong policy of determining cases on their merits,” Fla. Physician's Ins. Co., Inc. v. Ehlers, 8 F.3d 780, 783 (11th Cir. 1993), the request for clerk's default (Doc. 73) is DENIED. Central Park South, LLC must respond to the amended complaint by June 3, 2024.