From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norwood v. Stearns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 9, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-140 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-140

06-09-2015

DAWN NORWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH STEARNS. et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #7), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as to Defendants Sterns and Willis and remanded to the Dayton Municipal Court as to Defendant Garnes. June 9, 2015

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Norwood v. Stearns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 9, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-140 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Norwood v. Stearns

Case Details

Full title:DAWN NORWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH STEARNS. et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-140 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 9, 2015)