Norton v. Norton

2 Citing cases

  1. DeMontmorin v. DuPont

    484 A.2d 582 (D.C. 1984)   Cited 7 times

    The law in the District of Columbia is to the contrary. Norton v. Norton, 298 A.2d 514, 515 (D.C. 1972); Edmonds v. Edmonds, 146 A.2d 774, 776 (D.C. 1958). Several days later, on October 19, the parties, in New York, agreed to a stipulated settlement of appellee's visitation rights; appellee's attorney in that proceeding informed the New York court that the stipulation read into the record settled "the issues and matters presented in this action.

  2. Minnesota v. Johnson

    31 Wn. App. 704 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982)   Cited 2 times
    In Burleigh, the defendant's ex-wife obtained a child support order against the defendant in a Minnesota court and sought to enforce it through the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA).

    [2] The show cause procedure complements URESA's statutory requirements and is used in other states. See Dansby v. Dansby, 222 Ga. 118, 149 S.E.2d 252 (1966); Norton v. Norton, 298 A.2d 514 (D.C. 1972). Unlike regular civil proceedings, an order to show cause sets a definite time and place for a hearing, as required by RCW 26.21.110.