Opinion
Argued October 22, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 125 N.J.L. 136.
For the appellant, Martin Klughaupt.
For the respondents, Thomas E. Duffy.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.