From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 8, 2006
944 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

No. SC06-1817.

November 8, 2006.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to reinstatement of Case No. SC06-48, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norton v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 8, 2006
944 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Norton v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE J. NORTON, Petitioner(s) v. THOMAS D. HALL, CLERK, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 8, 2006

Citations

944 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2006)