From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Graham & Dunn, P.C.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Nov 2, 2016
383 P.3d 1018 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

No. 93335–9

11-02-2016

John Norton and Kristine Norton, et al., Petitioners, v. Graham & Dunn, P.C., Respondent.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its November 1, 2016, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the Petition for Review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Norton v. Graham & Dunn, P.C.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Nov 2, 2016
383 P.3d 1018 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

Norton v. Graham & Dunn, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:John Norton and Kristine Norton, et al., Petitioners, v. Graham & Dunn…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

383 P.3d 1018 (Wash. 2016)
186 Wash. 2d 1021
186 Wn. 2d 1021