From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Cupp

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 23, 1981
636 P.2d 468 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 115,631, CA A20649

Argued and submitted July 27, 1981

Reversed and remanded for an order allowing a delayed appeal November 23, 1981

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Clarke C. Brown, Judge.

Timothy G. Garlock, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Eric W. Olsen, Salem.

Virginia L. Linder, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for an order allowing a delayed appeal.


Petitioner appeals dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The court found he had been denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because his appointed counsel had failed to file a timely notice of appeal. The court dismissed the petition on the basis that he had not shown a meritorious ground for an appeal. For the reasons expressed in Daniel v. Cupp, 54 Or. App. 824, 636 P.2d 452 (1981), we reverse and remand for entry of an order allowing petitioner to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the order.


Summaries of

Norton v. Cupp

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 23, 1981
636 P.2d 468 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Norton v. Cupp

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EDWARD NORTON, Appellant, v. CUPP, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 23, 1981

Citations

636 P.2d 468 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
636 P.2d 468