From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northwestern Bell v. Caldor Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
Apr 2, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 3029 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Opinion

No. CV91 0116891 S

April 2, 1992


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS


The defendant has moved to dismiss the action on the grounds that the plaintiff does not have a certificate of authority to transact business in Connecticut and therefore cannot maintain the present action pursuant to provisions of General Statutes 33-412 (a).

The issues raised by the defendant cannot be considered on a motion to dismiss the action but rather, should be addressed in responsive pleadings directed to the complaint. Menley And James Laboratories Ltd. v. Mott's Super Markets Inc., 26 Conn. Sup. 434 (1966) (Palmer, J.); see also, United States Trust Co. of New York v. DiGagello, 179 Conn. 246, 249 (1979); Boxed Beef Distributors, Inc., 7 Conn. App. 555, 558 (1986).

The court also notes that, even prior to the argument of the Motion to Dismiss, the defendant filed an answer and special defense asserting that the plaintiff cannot maintain the action because it did not obtain the required Certificate of Authority to transact business. Under such circumstances the right to raise the issue by motion to dismiss would be waived.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.

RUSH, J.


Summaries of

Northwestern Bell v. Caldor Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
Apr 2, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 3029 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)
Case details for

Northwestern Bell v. Caldor Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NORTHWESTERN BELL v. CALDOR INC

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford

Date published: Apr 2, 1992

Citations

1992 Ct. Sup. 3029 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Citing Cases

Starwood Capital Group, L.P. v. Kukral

A review of a majority of superior court decisions reveal that those courts follow the rule set out in Peters…