Opinion
No. 11–P–2106.
2012-11-7
NORTHSHORE CHIROPRACTIC v. COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY.
By the Court (CYPHER, BERRY & AGNES, JJ.).
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
We conclude, for substantially the reasons set forth by the Appellate Division of the District Court that, as a matter of law, Northshore Chiropractic is not entitled to recover in its underlying personal injury protection claim, and, therefore, may not recover for alleged violations of G.L. c. 176D and 93A.
Decision and order of the Appellate Division affirmed.