From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northington v. Priddy

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 25, 1935
162 So. 408 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)

Opinion

6 Div. 817.

June 25, 1935.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lamar County; R. L. Blanton, Judge.

Proceeding between J. A. Northington and Otto Priddy and others, executors. From the judgment, J. A. Northington appeals.

Affirmed.

Wilson Kelley, of Vernon. for appellant.

R. G. Redden, of Vernon, for appellees.


Appellant is responsible for this appeal; and, if we understand the contentions in the briefs filed here on his behalf, one of same is that the appeal is improperly taken. He will not be heard to so complain.

Another contention seems to be in behalf of the sureties on appellant's bond. Such is premature, or without the purview of the present duty of this court.

The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions. It has been ruled that the duty rests upon appellant to not only "assign error," but to, in his brief, "point it out" and "argue it," with citation of authorities, if such exist. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. Smalley (Ala.App.) 156 So. 639. In this case this has not been done. Of course, we do not intimate that appellant's counsel has been remiss in his duty. It may be that the rulings apparent were without error.

Ante, p. 177.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Northington v. Priddy

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 25, 1935
162 So. 408 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)
Case details for

Northington v. Priddy

Case Details

Full title:NORTHINGTON v. PRIDDY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 25, 1935

Citations

162 So. 408 (Ala. Crim. App. 1935)
26 Ala. App. 476

Citing Cases

Schwabacher v. Herring

While not intimating that any of these assertions are meritorious, we refrain from consideration of them…