From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northern Texas Tract. v. Adams

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 11, 1922
241 S.W. 275 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)

Opinion

No. 2549.

April 28, 1922. Rehearing Denied May 11, 1922.

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. E. L. Roy, Judge.

Action by Bessie Bell Adams by her next friend, against the Northern Texas Traction Company. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

The suit is by appellee, by next friend, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision between two street cars of appellant. Bessie Bell Adams was a passenger on one of the cars. The plaintiff's amended petition did not specify any act of negligence, but alleged generally that the collision was due to the negligence of appellant's employees. The defendant answered by general denial, and specially pleaded the exercise of care, skill, and prudence in operating the cars and unavoidable accident, setting up the facts respecting the same.

There was a trial before a jury on special issues submitted to them. The court submitted to the jury the four issues, viz.: (1) Whether the defendant was negligent; (2) whether the negligence was the proximate cause of the injury; (3) whether the plaintiff was injured; and (4) the amount of the damages. On the verdict of the jury the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Capps, Cantey, Hanger Short, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Mercer, Wall Rouer, Gillis Johnson, J. E. Mercer, and R. E. Rouer, all of Fort Worth, for appellee.


The appellant asked and the court refused to submit the issue of accident or unavoidable injury. Error is predicated on the refusal to submit this requested issue. The appellant specially pleaded accident, and the evidence sufficiently raised, we conclude, the question of unavoidable happening of the collision. According to the late case of Railway Co. v. Ada Rowe (Com. App.) 238 S.W. 908, the refusal to submit such question for finding by the jury is reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial.


Summaries of

Northern Texas Tract. v. Adams

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 11, 1922
241 S.W. 275 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)
Case details for

Northern Texas Tract. v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:NORTHERN TEXAS TRACTION CO. v. ADAMS

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: May 11, 1922

Citations

241 S.W. 275 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)

Citing Cases

N. Texas Traction Co. v. Armour Co.

Nor do we believe that the court erred in refusing appellant's request for the submission of the issue as to…

Bailey v. Woodrum Truck Lines

nces the opinion was interpreted as indicating that the requested instructions presented the defense of…