From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northern Natural Gas Producing Co. v. McCoy

Supreme Court of Kansas
Jan 21, 1967
422 P.2d 564 (Kan. 1967)

Opinion

No. 44,569

Opinion filed January 21, 1967.

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; HOWARD C. KLINE, judge. Opinion filed January 21, 1967, modifying opinion filed December 10, 1966. (For original opinion of affirmance see Northern Natural Gas Producing Co. v. McCoy, 197 Kan. 740, 421 P.2d 190.)


OPINION ON MOTION FOR MODIFICATION


Opinion of the court was delivered by


The appellant has filed a motion for modification of this court's decision. Through inadvertence, this court's opinion of December 10, 1966, reflected that the judgment of the district court affirmed an order of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining an assessment of additional corporate state income tax liability against the appellant for the taxable year 1960, in the amount of $79,934.81. We are now advised that in overruling the appellant's motion for a new trial, the district court modified its judgment previously rendered against the appellant in the foregoing amount, by ordering the same reduced to the sum of $68,455.68 as basic additional income tax assessment, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1/2 percent per month from and after April 15, 1961.

Accordingly, this court's opinion is modified as affirming the judgment rendered by the district court against the appellant in the sum of $68,455.68, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1/2 percent per month from and after April 15, 1961, and as modified, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Northern Natural Gas Producing Co. v. McCoy

Supreme Court of Kansas
Jan 21, 1967
422 P.2d 564 (Kan. 1967)
Case details for

Northern Natural Gas Producing Co. v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:NORTHERN NATURAL GAS PRODUCING COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. WAYNE…

Court:Supreme Court of Kansas

Date published: Jan 21, 1967

Citations

422 P.2d 564 (Kan. 1967)
422 P.2d 564

Citing Cases

Northern Natural Gas Producing Co. v. McCoy

The judgment is affirmed. Reporter's Note: For opinion on motion for modification see 198 Kan. 79, 422 P.2d…