From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 1, 1992
832 P.2d 52 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

WCB 89-14670; CA A68207

Argued and submitted May 18, 1992

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration July 1, 1992

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Malagon, Moore, Johnson Jensen, Eugene.

David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that denied him attorney fees to be paid by SAIF in addition to compensation. SAIF concedes that the Board erred under the 1991 amendment to ORS 656.386(1). We agree with SAIF's concession.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 1, 1992
832 P.2d 52 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Chuck Northcutt, Claimant. Chuck…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 1, 1992

Citations

832 P.2d 52 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
832 P.2d 52

Citing Cases

Hughes v. Saif Corporation

We accept the concession. See Northcutt v. BJ's Ice Cream Parlor, 113 Or. App. 748, 832 P.2d 52 (1992);…