From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North v. Chillingworth

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Sep 16, 1949
42 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1949)

Opinion

July 5, 1949. Rehearing Denied September 16, 1949.

Claude L. McCoy, Lake Worth, and E.M. Baynes, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General, Reeves Bowen and Fred M. Burns, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.


Original proceeding on the petition of James B. North, Sr., and others against C.E. Chillingworth, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, and the State, on the relation of Phil O'Connell, as state's attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, for a writ of prohibition absolute.

Writ denied and rule discharged.


It now appearing by the record on the application for the issuance of a writ of prohibition absolute that the matters in issue have heretofore become res judicata by reason of the former decree of this court in North v. State, Fla., 33 So.2d 162, it is ordered that the writ of prohibition absolute be denied and the rule discharged.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

North v. Chillingworth

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Sep 16, 1949
42 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1949)
Case details for

North v. Chillingworth

Case Details

Full title:NORTH ET AL. v. CHILLINGWORTH, JUDGE, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Sep 16, 1949

Citations

42 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1949)