From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Pacifica, Llc. v. City of Pacifica

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 29, 2008
No. C-01-4823 EMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. C-01-4823 EMC.

September 29, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING REFUND OF DEPOSIT (Docket No. 649)


The City of Pacifica has asked for an order releasing to it the security deposit that it previously filed with the Court in the amount of $783,505.56. See Docket No. 649. North Pacifica initially opposed the request because it had not yet decided at the time whether to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. North Pacifica, however, has now orally informed the Court that it is not pursuing such a petition. Accordingly, North Pacifica does not oppose the release of the City's deposit. See Opp'n at 2 ("If a decision is made not to pursue a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, North Pacifica will stipulate to the release of the City's deposit."). Taking into account all of the circumstances, including North Pacifica's lack of opposition, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' application. The Court orders the Clerk of the Court to refund the deposit to the City.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

North Pacifica, Llc. v. City of Pacifica

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 29, 2008
No. C-01-4823 EMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2008)
Case details for

North Pacifica, Llc. v. City of Pacifica

Case Details

Full title:NORTH PACIFICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PACIFICA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Citations

No. C-01-4823 EMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2008)