From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Country Rocky Point v. Lewyt-Patchogue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1978
60 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

January 16, 1978


Appeal by North Country Rocky Point, Inc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 10, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) dismissed its complaint which sought, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and (2) awarded possession of the premises in question to Lewyt-Patchogue Company, and appeal by the Lewyt-Patchogue Company from so much of a further judgment of the same court, dated December 21, 1976, as dismissed its third-party complaint against Daniel D. Cantor. Judgment entered December 10, 1976 affirmed, and judgment dated December 21, 1976 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The alleged anticipatory breach by Lewyt-Patchogue Company was waived by North Country Rocky Point, Inc., when it chose to treat the contract as valid and subsisting (see Strasbourger v Leerburger, 233 N.Y. 55, 59). There is no merit to Lewyt's contention that Cantor, though not a signatory of the lease, was personally liable thereon. Latham, J.P., Damiani, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

North Country Rocky Point v. Lewyt-Patchogue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1978
60 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

North Country Rocky Point v. Lewyt-Patchogue

Case Details

Full title:NORTH COUNTRY ROCKY POINT, INC., Appellant, v. LEWYT-PATCHOGUE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1978

Citations

60 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People v. Rosenfeld

Thus, the parties, through their conduct, waived any alleged breach when they chose to continue to treat the…

Lucente v. International Business Machines Corp.

There is no specific time limit within which the non-repudiating party must elect his remedy, but if the…