From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Carolina ex Rel. Horne v. Chafin

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1983
309 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1983)

Opinion

No. 304PA83

Filed 6 December 1983

APPEAL as a matter of right under (G.S. 7A-30 (1) from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 62 N.C. App. 95, 302 S.E.2d 281 (1983), affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants entered by Griffin, Judge, on 5 January 1982 in Superior Court, MECKLENBURG County. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 November 1983.

Hugh Joseph Beard, Jr., for the plaintiff appellant.

Frank B. Aycock, III, for the defendant appellees, Chafin, Gantt, Short, Locke, Carroll, Danelly, Leeper, Frech, Trosch, Selden, Cox, and Harris.

Ruff, Bond, Cobb, Wade McNair, by James O. Cobb and Marvin A. Bethune, for the defendant appellees, Hair, Peacock, Ray and Thomas.

Helms, Mullis Johnston, by Robert B. Cordle, for the defendant appellee, The Charlotte Chamber of Commerce.


The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants alleging that they illegally used tax funds to pay for a reception for members of the General Assembly and others. The plaintiff contends that these funds were used for the purpose of lobbying members of the General Assembly in an effort to induce them to pass legislation affecting the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County which legislation was contrary to the plaintiff's beliefs.

The defendants, city council and chamber of commerce members, filed motions under Rule 12 (b)(6) to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief. The plaintiff and the defendant county commissioners filed motions for summary judgment. After considering all materials filed during discovery and the arguments of counsel, the trial court treated the motions to dismiss under Rule 12 (b)(6) as motions for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of all of the defendants. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

It is not necessary that this Court consider or pass upon each of the statements contained in the opinion of the Court of Appeals in order to affirm the result reached therein. The holding of the Court of Appeals affirming summary judgment for the defendants by the trial court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

North Carolina ex Rel. Horne v. Chafin

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1983
309 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1983)
Case details for

North Carolina ex Rel. Horne v. Chafin

Case Details

Full title:NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. CHARLES E. HORNE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND UPON BEHALF OF…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1983

Citations

309 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1983)
309 S.E.2d 239

Citing Cases

Madison Cablevision v. City of Morganton

Later cases from both this Court and the Court of Appeals do not state the test for public purpose in the…

Bardolph v. Arnold

Finally, the courts of North Carolina have determined that lobbying by local government to create support for…