From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Broward Radiologists v. Rush

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 10, 1989
541 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-0296.

March 29, 1989. Clarification Denied May 10, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert Lance Andrews, Judge.

Gale C. Payne and James C. Pilkey of Taylor, Brion, Buker Greene, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Edward J. Richardson and Brian P. Rush of Woodlief, Rush, Smith Richardson, Tampa, for appellee.


This is an appeal from dismissal of a complaint with prejudice. We do not attempt to second-guess the trial court as to the reasons for dismissal of the various counts of the complaint, which were based upon several different causes of action. We hold simply that the complaint did sufficiently allege a cause of action for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship ( see, e.g., DeRitis v. AHZ Corp., 444 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)), and for breach of contract (by violating the alleged covenant not to compete). See Akey v. Murphy, 238 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1970). See also Chessick Clinic, P.A. v. Jones, 367 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

North Broward Radiologists v. Rush

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 10, 1989
541 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

North Broward Radiologists v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:NORTH BROWARD RADIOLOGISTS, P.A., APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL J. RUSH, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 10, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

North Broward Radiologists v. Rush

This is an appeal from an order striking a renewed motion for temporary injunction. It is apparently…