From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norry v. Ronnen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Tillman, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied defendant's application for attorneys' fees and disbursements (see, Sullivan v Getty Petroleum Corp., 131 A.D.2d 558, 560). Attorneys' fees and disbursements are incidents of litigation and the prevailing party may not collect them from the loser unless an award is authorized by agreement between the parties or by statute or court rule (Matter of A.G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 N.Y.2d 1, 5). Here, the parties did not agree to an award of attorneys' fees in the management agreement nor is there any statute or court rule permitting recovery of such fees in the circumstances of this case.


Summaries of

Norry v. Ronnen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Norry v. Ronnen

Case Details

Full title:NEIL NORRY et al., Respondents, v. DEBORAH RONNEN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
545 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Ronnen v. Ajax Electric Motor Corp.

We respectfully dissent. This is the latest episode in a feud over the operation of Ajax Electric Motor Corp.…