From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Dec 2, 2022
1:17CR242-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2022)

Opinion

1:17CR242-1 1:19CV795

12-02-2022

JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge.

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on October 18, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. (Docs. 104, 105.) Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 107.)

The court has carefully reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court finds that the objections do not change the substance of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and the court therefore adopts the Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 62), be DENIED. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.


Summaries of

Norris v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Dec 2, 2022
1:17CR242-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Norris v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

1:17CR242-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2022)