From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 2, 2016
204 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16–2875

12-02-2016

Ronald Norris, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Ronald Norris, Bristol, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Ronald Norris, Bristol, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Norris appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion in which he alleged that his written sentence conflicted with the trial court's oral pronouncement. The record before us does not contain the transcript of the sentencing hearing, nor was it attached to Norris's motion or the trial court's order. Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court to determine if the transcript is in the record. If it is, the trial court shall either grant the relief Norris seeks or attach portions of the sentencing transcript that refute his claim. If the transcript is not in the record, Norris's motion shall be denied without prejudice to allow him to file an amended motion with the transcript attached. Beard v. State , 27 So.3d 186, 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 2, 2016
204 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Norris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ronald Norris, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 2, 2016

Citations

204 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)