From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. Ross

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 14, 2005
Case No. C 05-2854-MHP (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 05-2854-MHP.

September 14, 2005

THOMAS S. BRIGHAM, BROOKE A. BRIGHAM, Ukiah, California, STEPHEN NORRIS, as Executor for the Estate of Edward Norris, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

THOMAS N. THOMSON, Attorney for Defendant Harold Ross.


REMAND ORDER ( 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c))


The parties to this action agree and stipulate that this mater be remanded to the Court from which it was removed, the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Mendocino.

The parties further agree and stipulate that Plaintiff will withdraw his claim for costs incurred in bringing his motion to remand without prejudice.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this cause is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Mendocino. The Clerk of this Court is directed to prepare a certified copy of this Order and mail it to the Clerk of the Superior Court of California, County of Mendocino.


Summaries of

Norris v. Ross

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 14, 2005
Case No. C 05-2854-MHP (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Norris v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN NORRIS, as Executor for the Estate of Edward Norris, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2005

Citations

Case No. C 05-2854-MHP (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)