From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. Ramen Meijin Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 23, 2022
21 Civ. 9389 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9389 (LGS)

03-23-2022

NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. RAMEN MEJIN INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Ramen Meijin Inc. filed a Proposed Case Management Plan on February 15, 2022, which proposed that the parties participate in the District's Mediation Program in the next sixty (60) days.

WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, the case was referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program.

WHEREAS, the Report of the Mediator, dated March 22, 2022, states that mediation was not held because one or both parties failed, refused to attend, or refused to participate in the mediation. It is hereby

ORDERED that by March 28, 2022, the parties shall file a letter explaining why mediation did not take place, and whether they wish to participate in the District's Mediation Program at a future date.


Summaries of

Norris v. Ramen Meijin Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 23, 2022
21 Civ. 9389 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Norris v. Ramen Meijin Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. RAMEN MEJIN INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 9389 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)