From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. Lee

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2022
21-CV-8538 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-8538 (JPO)

06-03-2022

NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. NAE SUNG LEE, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant 220 West Investors LLC was served on January 4, 2022. Defendant Nae Sung Lee was served on January 14, 2022. However, no appearance has been entered on either defendant's behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.

Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Defendants or their counsel regarding a response to the complaint.

If Plaintiff fails by June 21, 2022, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Norris v. Lee

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2022
21-CV-8538 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Norris v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. NAE SUNG LEE, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

21-CV-8538 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)