From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. David E. Azar, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2022
21 Civ. 7292 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 7292 (JPC)

06-01-2022

NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID E. AZAR, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

John P. Cronan, United States District Judge

The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and with prejudice, with the right to restore the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within sixty days of this Order in the event the settlement agreement is not completed and executed. Any such application filed after sixty days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Pursuant to 3.F of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Norris v. David E. Azar, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2022
21 Civ. 7292 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Norris v. David E. Azar, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NAMEL NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID E. AZAR, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 7292 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)