From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norman v. Stout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Oct 9, 2014
NO: 2:14-cv-00092-JTR (E.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO: 2:14-cv-00092-JTR

10-09-2014

JEFFREY SCOTT NORMAN, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER- STOUT, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMSIING HABEAS ACTION

Magistrate Judge Rodgers filed a Report and Recommendation on August 19, 2014, recommending that Mr. Norman's habeas action be dismissed as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), and also as procedurally defaulted. ECF No. 7. There being no objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. This habeas action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive shall file this Order, enter judgment of dismissal in favor of Respondent and forward copies to Petitioner. The Court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R.App. P. 22(b).

DATED this 9th day of October 2014.

s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson

ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON

Chief United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Norman v. Stout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Oct 9, 2014
NO: 2:14-cv-00092-JTR (E.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Norman v. Stout

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY SCOTT NORMAN, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER- STOUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Oct 9, 2014

Citations

NO: 2:14-cv-00092-JTR (E.D. Wash. Oct. 9, 2014)