Opinion
January, 1928
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.
Order denying motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Norman v. Queens Bus Line, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Summaries of
Norman v. Queens Bus Line, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for
Norman v. Queens Bus Line, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE NORMAN, Respondent, v. QUEENS BUS LINE, INC., Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1928
Citations
222 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)