From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norman v. Pinkerton Props.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Feb 7, 2019
No. 02-18-00251-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2019)

Opinion

No. 02-18-00251-CV

02-07-2019

TASHA RENEE NORMAN, Appellant v. PINKERTON PROPERTIES, Appellee


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2018-003893-1 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On January 4, 2019, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief despite the opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam Delivered: February 7, 2019


Summaries of

Norman v. Pinkerton Props.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Feb 7, 2019
No. 02-18-00251-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2019)
Case details for

Norman v. Pinkerton Props.

Case Details

Full title:TASHA RENEE NORMAN, Appellant v. PINKERTON PROPERTIES, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Feb 7, 2019

Citations

No. 02-18-00251-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2019)