Opinion
Case No. 1:08-CV-2531.
March 2, 2010
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This matter arises sua sponte. It has come to the attention of the Court that its order remanding this case (Doc. 17) did not make clear whether the case was to be remanded under "sentence-four" or "sentence-six" of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Poellnitz v. Astrue, Case No. 09-11862, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996, at *10-11 (11th Cir. Oct. 21, 2009) ("Sentence-six and sentence-four remands are designed to remedy separate problems." (citation omitted)).
This matter was remanded under "sentence-four."