From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 14, 2016
No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-14-01288-CV

01-14-2016

JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant v. ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02276-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Myers

The parties have filed an agreed motion for disposition of this appeal under rule 42.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In the motion, the parties request that this Court effectuate the settlement by rendering judgment in accordance with their settlement agreement. Accordingly, we grant the parties' motion, we vacate the trial court's judgment, and we render judgment as requested.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE 141288F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02276-C.
Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Fillmore and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date and the parties agreed motion for disposition of this appeal under rule 42.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we VACATE the judgment of the trial court and we RENDER judgment that the claims of appellant Jay Nordstrom against appellee Robert Gordon d/b/a Stuttgart Auto Group are dismissed with prejudice, any claims appellant Jay Nordstrom has on the bond filed by appellee Robert Gordon d/b/a Stuttgart Auto Group in the Justice Court or against the sureties on the bond are dismissed with prejudice, and that the costs and attorney's fees incurred by the parties in the trial court and in this Court be borne by the party who incurred them. We ORDER the County Clerk of Dallas County to release the full amount of the cash deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond to appellant Jay Nordstrom at 11817 Cromwell Drive, Dallas, Texas 75234. We further ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to release the mandate instanter. Judgment entered this 14th day of January, 2016.


Summaries of

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 14, 2016
No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant v. ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 14, 2016

Citations

No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)