From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 16, 2014
No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-14-01288-CV

12-16-2014

JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant v. ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02276-C

ORDER

By postcard dated October 8, 2014, we notified Court Reporter Janet Wright that the reporter's record in this case was overdue. We directed Ms. Wright to file the reporter's record within thirty days. To date, Ms. Wright has not responded. By letter dated November 18, 2014, appellant Nordstrom notified the Court that he had "requested that the court reporter prepare the reporter's record and send the notice of cost." Appellant also notified the Court that Ms. Wright has failed to respond to his request.

Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Janet Wright to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, written verification that appellant has not made payment arrangements for the record. If payment arrangements have been made, we ORDER Court Reporter Janet Wright to file the reporter's record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 16, 2014
No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Nordstrom v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant v. ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Dec 16, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-01288-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)