From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noonkester v. Parker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ S-04-1571 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. Civ S-04-1571 DFL KJM P.

October 20, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 5, 2004, plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended civil action. The time has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended civil action or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Noonkester v. Parker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ S-04-1571 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Noonkester v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:RILEY NOONKESTER, Plaintiff, v. CLAY PARKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

No. Civ S-04-1571 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)